What is open theism? Open theism denies that God has ordained the course of events. It therefore minimizes God's sovereignty and appeals to our sinful hearts. Our Christology determines our understanding of God’s relationship to creation. This article elaborates on how the person of Christ and His incarnation helps us to understand who God is.

Defending the use of persuasion as a method of apologetics, this article shows that persuasion takes into account both the one communicating the gospel and the one to whom it is communicated. Persuasion can be inoffensive without compromising the truth of the gospel.

Using homosexuality and abortion as examples, this article shows how sin works to the point that vices become embraced as the norm. The author of this article encourages Christians to use the unreasonableness of sin as a foundation for apologetics.

This article discusses an objection raised against covenantal apologetics. The author states that reformed apologetics requires an affirmation of the absolute necessity of God's existence, and of the Bible as the self-attesting revelation of this God.

This article tackles the objection raised against convenantal apologetics which rejects scripture's self-authenticity. The author examines the claim that scripture requires a form of reason to establish its authenticity, and finds that looking for this outside scripture is to make man the authority.

This article discusses the objection raised against covenantal apologetics which states that covenantal apologetics does not describe reason as the foundation of knowledge. This is the third and final article discussing this objection.

This article looks at an objection raised against covenantal apologetics. This objection against covenantal apologetics is found in the distinction between epistemology and ontology. This is the second of three articles discussing this objection.

This article discusses an objection raised against covenantal apologetics. This objection against covenantal apologetics is found in the distinction between epistemology and ontology, and focuses on the issue of the basis of knowledge. This is the first of three articles discussing this objection.

This article discusses the objection to covenantal apologetics which states that covenantal apologetics employs circle reasoning.

This article looks at the tenth tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. Reformed apologetics is rooted in the knowledge that everything is a result of the sovereign plan and purpose of God.

This article looks at the ninth tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. The author of this article talks about how we should seek to persuade others when we practice apologetics.

This article looks at the eighth tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. Due to the Fall into sin, individuals suppress the truth about God. The author of this article discusses this fact in relationship with the topic of apologetics.

This article looks at the seventh tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. The author maintains that Christian theism is absolute truth, and anything opposing it is false. It is important to understand this when practicing apologetics.

This article looks at the sixth tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. The author discusses how there are two kinds of people: those who are in Christ, and those who are in Adam. This understanding of man's position is unique to Reformed apologetics, and has implications for the practice of apologetics.

This article discusses the fifth tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. Looking at the text of Romans 1:18-21, the author shows that all people know God, and this knowledge entails covenental obligations. The author discusses what this means in relation to apologetics.

This article looks at the fourth tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. The author discusses how man is created in the image of God, and what this means for doing apologetics.

This article looks at the third tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, written by Scott Oliphint. The effectiveness of apologetics is dependant on the work of the Word and the Holy Spirit in the individual.

This article looks at the first tenet identified in Covenental Apologetics, by Scott Oliphint. The author discusses how apologetics starts with God and His revelation, highlighting creation and redemption as the work of the Triune God.

This article looks at the challenge of suffering and evil, and the way this is used to object against the existence of a good God. The author of this article highlights a proper perspective on the presence of evil in this world.

Why do evil and suffering exist? This question does not only face Christians. This article looks at the answer to this question that is provided by Richard Dawkins. The gaps in Dawkins' theory can be used to point to the Christian explanation as the only proper way of explaining suffering.

An objection frequently raised against the existence of a good God is the existence of suffering and evil. This article shows that this objection has no grounds, because in scripture it is clear that evil and a good God do exist and that this existence is not incompatible. The author shows how through apologetics one can move from this objection to the heart of the gospel.

Satan can deceive us by making us think that our reasoning is independent of Christ and through this autonomy we are able to win people for Christ. This article shows that following such a path is to fall in the hands of the Satan and his craftiness. Apologetics and evangelism are only done in dependence on Christ.

The author of this article discusses where we stand in our covenant with God. Every individual is represented either in Adam or in Christ. This article relates this concept to the topic of apologetics.

How should we practice apologetics with unbelievers? This article discusses how we can share the gospel with those who remain dead in Adam instead of alive in Christ.

Holding to the absolute truth of the antithesis (that either one is in Adam or in Christ), this article shows that the antithesis should not hinder the practice of apologetics. The fact that all are created in the image of God creates room for the persuasion of apologetics.

All forms of epistemology must appeal to some form of authority as their standing ground. This article shows that for Christians doing apologetics this standing ground is the Bible. There is no way of going beyond this foundation in evangelism.

This article shows how the book of Jude serves as encouragement to do apologetics within the church.

Looking at Philippians 2:7, this article shows what it means that Christ "emptied Himself". Does it mean that Christ was not God anymore?

This article shows how the link to the covenantal heads constitutes the antithetical view to life. Individuals are connected either to the first Adam or the second Adam - Christ Jesus. This connection shapes the practice of apologetics for Christians. The author discusses the antithesis from Romans 5:12-21.

This article looks at the relationship between the guidance of the Holy Spirit and the sufficiency and authority of scripture. It shows that the Holy Spirit uses scripture to illuminate our minds to God's truth, and that God does not give extra revelation to what we already have in scripture.

Looking at the meaning of the term 'transcendental meditation', this article shows that Van Til used this term in apologetics to express the idea that the Christian faith alone is true.

This article looks at the relationship between apologetics and the use of Scripture.

This article looks at the relationship between Christianity and logic. God is the standard of truth, and therefore logic is a means to arriving at truth, not the determining factor of truth. Christian logic involves taking the truth of the Triune God into account.

The existence of suffering and evil has been raised as an objection against the existence of a God who is omniscient, omnipotent and wholly good. This article shows how this objection is answered in Christ.

This article looks at Romans 1:18 and its implication for apologetics. The author shows that what man denies about God says something about his knowledge of God.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 33:3 is about judgment.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 7:3 is about covenant theology.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 7:2 is about covenant of works and covenant theology.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 7:1 is about the will of God and freedom.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 1:6 is about Scripture.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 1:5 is about Scripture.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 33:2 is about heaven, hell and judgment.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 33:1 is about judgment.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 7:1 is about covenant theology.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 1:1 is about Scripture.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 7:1 is about the self-sufficiency of God, covenant and the sovereignty of God.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 1:4 is about Scripture.

This article on the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 1:7 is about Scripture.

This article is about apologetics and Scripture and philosophy. The author also looks at truth and the unbeliever, as well as apologetics (defending the faith) and evangelism.