Osborne writes this article from the conviction that in Hebrews the conflict of religions is pervasive. He wants to understand the nature of the clash that took place and contextualizes it for current situations. He notes the rhetorical strategy of the author and the centrality of Christ in Hebrews.

Is redaction criticism a legitimate exegetical tool in the interpretation of the New Testament? The focus of this paper is the concerns some evangelical scholars have with the use of redaction criticism.

The author wants to demonstrate the value of critical exegetical tools, in particular redaction criticism, for the task of preaching. The paper makes use of Mark 9:14-29 as a test case to illustrate how preaching from the gospels should function.

Osborne continues his positive reappraisal of redaction criticism as an exegetical tool. This essay reflects on thinking in evangelical circles about the legitimacy of this tool for exegesis of the New Testament, and also demonstrates the way it can function.

This paper considers the validity and possible worth of an application of tradition criticism as part of research on the life of Jesus and the so-called quests for the historical Jesus.

This paper contends that the determining factor in approaching and resolving questions pertaining to the role of women in the church is hermeneutics. Passages that deal with this topic are identified: 1 Timothy 2:8-15, 1 Corinthians 11:2-16, 1 Corinthians 14:34-36, Ephesians 5:22-33, Colossians 3:18-19, and 1 Peter 3:1-7.

What is redaction criticism? Osborne argues that it is a very positive tool for biblical interpretation. The aim of this article is to apply redaction criticism to the Great Commission in Matthew 28:16-20, to work towards a better understanding of the passage. Osborne then wants to apply it for a better understanding of inerrancy.