To denounce other people is a somewhat precarious activity. In fact, for one sinner to have the temerity to criticize another seems particularly galling, and liable to do more harm than good. Therefore, it is not altogether surprising that one should hear praise, especially at funerals, that a certain person 'never said a bad word about anyone'. It reflects a sentiment which is not without truth, but there is also truth in Richard Baxter's barbed comment, cited by J. C. Ryle in discussing the parable of the talents (Matt. 25:14-30): 'To do no harm is the praise of a stone, not of a man.' It is also commonly said that sarcasm is 'the lowest form of wit', and again it must be acknowledged that the sneering tone is often a sure means of illustrating why Proverbs 17:14 was written: 'The beginning of strife is like releasing water; therefore stop contention before a quarrel starts.'

Yet, for all that, the Bible is not unwilling at times to criticize, and even at times to mock, those who deserve such treatment. In doing so, it occasionally resorts to sarcasm – sometimes fiercely-worded sarcasm. This raises a question for the Christian today: Is it ever appropriate to resort to the use of sarcasm in confronting sinners with the claims of God and truth?

The Old Testament⤒🔗

In the contest on Mount Carmel between Elijah and the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal, the prophet used ridicule. He mocked the prophets of Baal regarding the inactivity of their fertility god: 'Cry aloud, for he is a god; either he is meditating, or he is busy, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is sleeping and must be awakened' (1 Kings 18:27).These taunts only spurred the prophets of Baal on to more furious but fruitless activity (1 Kings 18:28). Perhaps the chapter in the Old Testament which is most characterised by derision is Isaiah 44. Here God is pointing out the folly of idolatry. A man nurtures a tree, then finally cuts it down, to be used in two main ways.

Then it shall be for a man to burn, for he will take some of it and warm himself; yes, he kindles it and bakes bread; indeed he makes a god and worships it; he makes it a carved image, and falls down to it. He burns half of it in the fire; with this half he eats meat; he roasts a roast, and is satisfied. He even warms himself and says, "Ah! I am warm, I have seen the fire." And the rest of it he makes into a god, his carved image. He falls down before it and worships it, prays to it and says, "Deliver me, for you are my god!"Isa. 44:15-17

But Jeremiah 10 is almost as virulent: 'For the customs of the peoples are worthless; they cut a tree out of the forest, and a craftsman shapes it with his chisel. They adorn it with silver and gold; they fasten it with hammer and nails so it will not totter. Like a scarecrow in a melon patch, their idols cannot speak; they must be carried because they cannot walk. Do not fear them; they can do no harm nor can they do any good' (Jer. 10:3-5, NIV). The gods of the nations rank with fuel used for cooking! Sin is not only morally evil but intellectually absurd.

One of the most unforgettable insulting images used in the Old Testament is found in Amos' portrayal of the high society women of his day: 'Hear this word, you cows of Bashan, who are on the mountains of Samaria, who oppress the poor, who crush the needy, who say to your husbands, "Bring wine, let us drink!"' (Amos 4:1). The picture is savagely drawn, but in every way appropriate. Such a heartless love of luxury called out for fierce denunciation, not a mild expression of disagreement. Using a similar phrase, Psalm 22 refers to the strong 'bulls of Bashan' who had encircled the Saviour while on the cross (Psa. 22:12).

Christ's Preaching←⤒🔗

Our Lord himself was perfectly capable of being sarcastic when the occasion demanded it. In Mark 7:9 he condemns the Pharisees for setting aside the clear Word of God in order to maintain their Pharisaic traditions. The gist of what he says is: 'You are making a good job of rejecting the commandment of God.' Something similar operates in John 4, where Jesus asks the Samaritan woman by the well at Sychar to call her husband and return. She replies that she has no husband, to which Christ responds: 'You have well said, "I have no husband", for you have had five husbands, and the one whom you now have is not your husband; in that you spoke truly' (John 4:17-18). Clearly, Jesus was raising the subject of her sinful life. By means of a half-truth, the woman was trying to evade his supernatural knowledge of her sins, but Jesus' sarcasm made his comment all the more pointed.

Surely, too, Jesus was being sarcastic when he told the parable of the lost sheep against the Scribes and Pharisees and concluded with the words: 'I say to you likewise there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine just persons who need no repentance' (Luke 15:7). Calvin took at face value the reference to the ninety-nine who need no repentance, and said it meant those who were genuinely converted, and so did not need to repent for the first time. More convincing is the view of William Hendriksen and J. C. Ryle, who consider that the 'ninety-nine' refers to 'people who think themselves righteous and just, like the Pharisees, and fancy they need no repentance'.

In Matthew 23 Christ unleashes an onslaught of withering invective against the Pharisees for their hypocrisy and distorted values. It no doubt hit its mark, and it is revealing that it also offends the inclusivist sensibilities of the arch-liberal Episcopalian bishop, John Shelby Spong, who, while claiming to be a Christian and to love the Bible, criticized Christ for being 'narrow-minded, vindictive, and even hypocritical'. Christ's manner of speaking in Matthew 23 reflects his holy exasperation with the hardened unbelief of men who had seen more than enough evidence to convince them that Jesus of Nazareth was indeed the Christ. As Spurgeon put it: 'He is not the most loving who speaks the smoothest words'.

Others in the New Testament←⤒🔗

Similarly we meet an instance of sarcasm being effectively used in debate in the narrative of the man born blind (John 9). Whereas the man's parents had capitulated meekly for fear of being put out of the synagogue (John 9:18-23), the man himself proves to be quite a lively debater who refuses to take a backward step. Perceiving the corrupt motives of the Pharisees, he mocks the nation's religious leaders: 'Do you also want to become his disciples?' (John 9:27). He was reviled for this remark (v.28), since the Pharisees claimed to be Moses' disciples. They pretended not to know where Jesus was from. This pretended ignorance draws from the man born blind all his considerable powers of sarcasm: 'Why, this is a marvellous thing, that you do not know where he is from: yet he has opened my eyes!' (v.30). It was a fearless speech, and it led to his expulsion from the synagogue (v.34). At that point our Lord found him and led him to saving faith (vv. 35-38).

The Apostle Paul←⤒🔗

The Apostle Paul, too, was capable of being sarcastic when he thought the situation demanded it. He was none too gentle in attacking those who were advocating a gospel of justification by faith in Christ plus circumcision (Gal. 5:12). Paul's blood was boiling: 'As for those agitators, I wish they would go the whole way and emasculate themselves!' (NIV). The KJV and NKJV, along with William Ramsay and J. B. Phillips, interpret Paul to be saying that he wishes that those troubling the Galatian Christians would cut themselves off, but the Greek text and the overall context favour the harsher connotation of mutilating the body. It conveys Paul's indignant attitude to all who add to the gospel.

Paul's Corinthian correspondence provides other examples of studied insult or biting sarcasm. There is obvious mocking irony in Paul's comparison between his estimation of himself and the Corinthians' estimation of themselves:

You are already full! You are already rich! You have reigned as kings without us – and indeed I could wish you did reign, that we also might reign with you! For I think that God has displayed us, the apostles last, as men condemned to death; for we have been made a spectacle to the world, both to angels and to men. We are fools for Christ's sake, but you are wise in Christ! We are weak, but you are strong! You are distinguished, but we are dishonoured!1 Cor. 4:8-10

The NIV has made the sarcasm all the more obvious by inserting a so in the text (which is not there in the Greek): 'We are fools for Christ, but you are so wise in Christ!' Before the cross, the self-sufficient triumphalism of the Corinthians was totally out of place. Any biblical theology of glory must be derived from a theology of humiliation.

If anything, Paul is even more devastating in his sarcasm in 2 Corinthians 10-13 as he confronts the false apostles who have sought to undo his work in Corinth. Paul was obviously reluctant to speak assertively of his own authority and thus appear to be boasting, but the activities of the false apostles left him no choice. Hence he writes: 'For we dare not class ourselves or compare ourselves with those who commend themselves. But they, measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise' (2 Cor. 10-12). Later, he lampoons the Corinthians themselves: 'For you put up with fools gladly, since you yourselves are wise! For you put up with it if one brings you into bondage, if one devours you, if one takes from you, if one exalts himself, if one strikes you on the face.' Then, in exasperation, Paul offers a mock apology: 'To our shame, I say that we were too weak for that' (2 Cor. 11:19-21a).

A more contentious passage is found in the next chapter: 'I have become a fool in boasting, but you have compelled me. For I ought to have been commended by you; for in nothing was I behind the most eminent apostles, though I am nothing' (2 Cor. 12:11). Charles Hodge sees no irony in Paul's words and does not think that Paul is referring to the false apostles. Nor, in Hodge's view, does Paul do so earlier on in 2 Corinthians 11:5. In both passages, says Hodge, Paul is asserting his apostolic equality with Peter, James and John.

The NIV, however, treats this as another example of Paul's sarcasm: 'I have made a fool of myself, but you drove me to it. I ought to have been commended by you, for I am not in the least inferior to the "super-apostles", even though I am nothing' (12:11). F. F. Bruce understands this in the same way as 2 Corinthians 11:5, i.e., as an ironic reference to the inflated false apostles. A similar interpretation is put forward by Don Carson, Philip Edgecumbe Hughes, and Paul Barnett; and this seems to fit the context better than Hodge's view.

Failed Attempts←⤒🔗

Down through the ages a number of Christians have spoken very vigorously and indulged in sarcasm and invective, without always hitting the mark. One of the most obvious examples is Jerome, who lived from about 331 to 420. He possessed a deep need for friendship, but had a terrible capacity for falling out with those who were once his friends and then attacking them in most intemperate language. When his Latin translation of the Gospels was criticized, he claimed that this criticism came from 'asses with two legs'. When Jovinian tried to argue against some of the extremes of Christian asceticism, Jerome ridiculed his book as 'vomit which he has thrown up'. Pelagius (a huge man) was attacked as a 'big, bloated Alpine dog'. At times Jerome's unbridled language embarrassed those who might have leaned to his side of the argument.

It was Jerome's public and acrimonious dispute with his ertswhile friend Rufinus which led him to new heights – or depths – in verbal abuse. He attacked Rufinus in every way. 'So great is your purity that the devils sniff noisily, at your vests and underpants.' He continued to denounce 'the Scorpion' and the 'Grunting Pig' until 411 when, after Rufinus' death, Jerome could breath a sigh of relief: 'The many-headed sea-serpent has at last ceased to hiss against me.' Small wonder that Augustine could lament the fragility of human ties, and ask Jerome: 'Into whose breast can confiding love now pour itself without reserve?'

Jerome, following the example of the Bible itself, commonly employed animal names as terms to describe the public enemies of God. Psalm 22 refers to bulls (v. 12), a lion (v. 13), and dogs (v. 16), as well as the lion's mouth and the horns of the wild oxen (v. 21). John the Baptist condemns the Pharisees and Sadducees: 'Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?' (Matt. 3:7). In Matthew 23, Jesus declares God's woe upon the Scribes and Pharisees as 'blind guides who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel' (v. 24) and as 'serpents, brood of vipers' (v. 33). He once referred to Herod Antipas as 'that fox' (Luke 13:32). Those who are outside the New Jerusalem are 'dogs' (Rev. 22:15) while the man who professes Christ and then falls away is likened to a dog which returns to its own vomit or a washed sow which then wallows in the mire (2 Pet. 2:22). The difference is that the Bible can be fierce, but, unlike Jerome at his worst, it is never coarse.